Journal of Plant Registrations
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in JOURNAL OF PLANT REGISTRATIONS 3:91-93 (2009)
DOI: 10.3198/jpr2008.01.0002crg
© 2009 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pathan, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sleper, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pathan, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sleper, D. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pathan, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sleper, D. A.

GERMPLASM

Registration of Soybean Germplasm SS93-6012 and SS93-6181 Resistant to Phomopsis Seed Decay

M. S. Pathana, K. M. Clarka, J. A. Wratherb, G. L. Sciumbatoc, J. G. Shannonb, H. T. Nguyena and D. A. Slepera,*

a Division of Plant Sciences, Univ. of Missouri–Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211
b Division of Plant Sciences, Univ. of Missouri–Delta Center, P.O. Box 160, Portageville, MO 63873
c Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State Univ., Stoneville, MS 38776

* Corresponding author (sleperd{at}missouri.edu).

ABSTRACT

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] germplasm SS93-6012 (Reg. No. GP-362, PI 652442) and SS93-6181 (Reg. No. GP-363, PI 652443) were developed and released by the University of Missouri–Columbia in January 2006 as resistant to Phomopsis seed decay (PSD), caused by Phomopsis spp. Both lines were developed from a cross between MO/PSD-0259 (PI562694) (PSD-resistant MGIV germplasm) and ‘Asgrow 3834’ (PSD-susceptible MGIII cultivar) made in 1990 at the Bradford Research and Extension Center of the University of Missouri, Columbia, MO. The lines were composited in the F5 generation and evaluated for yield and Phomopsis seed decay infection. These lines are highly resistant to Phomopsis spp. SS93-6012 has a relative maturity of 4.2, purple flowers, gray pubescence, an indeterminate growth habit, tan pods at maturity, yellow color seeds, buff hila, and seed weight of ~14 g per 100 seeds. SS93-6181 has a relative maturity of 4.0, purple flowers, tawny pubescence, an indeterminate growth habit, tan pods at maturity, yellow color seeds, imperfect black hila, and seed weight of ~16 g per 100 seeds. So far, PSD-resistant commercial soybean cultivars are not available, and these two lines may be used for development of PSD-resistant high-yielding soybean cultivars.

Abbreviations: BREC, Bradford Research and Extension Center • ESPS, early soybean production system • PI, Plant introduction • PSD, Phomopsis seed decay

Anumber of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] farmers in the southern United States plant early-maturing soybean (MGIII and MGIV) cultivars in late March to mid-April so that pod fill can be completed before late-summer drought develops (in late July through August). This practice is known as the early soybean production system (ESPS) (Heatherly, 1999; Wrather et al., 2003), and yield and management advantages to this system were observed in some southern states, including Missouri (Wrather et al., 1996). Unfortunately, planting early-maturing cultivars in late March to mid-April enhances Phomopsis seed decay (PSD), an important seed disease of soybean that can significantly reduce crop production and seed quality (McGee, 1983; TeKrony et al., 1996; Wrather et al., 2003). Caused by Phomopsis spp., especially P. longicolla, PSD is endemic throughout the most soybean production areas of the world (Brown et al., 1987; Kulik and Sinclair, 1999). Yield suppression due to PSD varied among regions of the United States and years (Wrather et al., 1996), and soybean yield suppression was about 294,000 and 147,000 Mg in 2004 and 2005, respectively (Wrather and Koenning, 2008). The quality of oil derived from PSD-infected seeds is generally lower than that of oil extracted from healthy seeds (Hepperly and Sinclair, 1978). The severity of PSD depends on environmental factors such as high temperatures during pod fill and wet weather after seed maturation. Control measures for PSD include foliar application of fungicides at the R6 stage and planting in a way that pod fill occurs when temperatures are lower than midsummer (Wrather et al., 1996, 2003, 2004). This disease could be managed by planting Phomopsis sp.–resistant soybean cultivars (Wrather et al., 2004), but none are available. Our objective was to release PSD-resistant soybean germplasm to be used for development of PSD-resistant, high-yielding soybean cultivars.

Materials and Methods

Soybean line SS93-6012 (Reg. No. GP-362, PI 652442) and SS93-6181 (Reg. No. GP-363, PI 652443) (both MGIV) were developed from a cross between MO/PSD-0259 (PI562694) (PSD-resistant MGIV germplasm) and ‘Asgrow 3834’ (PSD-susceptible MGIII cultivar) in 1990 at the Bradford Research and Extension Center (BREC), Columbia, MO. MO/PSD-0259 is essentially a composite of 11 lines that resulted from the cross between PI417479 x Merschman ‘Dallas’ made at Columbia in 1984 and was registered as PSD-resistant germplasm in 1993 (Minor et al., 1993). The F1 and F3 generations were grown during the winters of 1990–1991 and 1991–1992 in Puerto Rico, respectively, while the rest of the generations were grown at the BREC. SS93-6012 and SS93-6181 were composited in the F5 generation at the BREC.

Agronomic Performance and Disease Reaction
From 1998 to 2001, Wrather et al. (2003, 2004) conducted a series of experiments on planting date, yield (data not shown), seed quality, seed infection by Phomopsis sp., and foliar fungicide effects on Phomopsis spp. seed infection using these lines along with the susceptible parent, Asgrow 3834. Wrather et al. (2003) reported that seed infection on three different dates of planting averaged over years was 25.2% for Asgrow 3834, 3.2% for SS93-6012, and 2.8% for SS93-6181. Wrather et al. (2004) also reported that percentage of Phomopsis spp. seed infection for Asgrow 3834 averaged over years was 52.8% and was significantly greater than 2.8% seed infection for SS93-6012. They did not find any significant differences in percentage of Phomopsis sp. seed infection for SS93-6012 between the control and foliar fungicide treatment. Shannon et al. (unpublished data, 2008) have evaluated above lines along with ‘Mustang’ (Schmidt et al., 1997) and ‘Maverick’ (Sleper et al., 1998) as checks for yield and Phomopsis spp. seed infection at two locations in Missouri and one location in Mississippi each at two planting dates. A significant difference in seed infection was observed among the lines but yield differences were nonsignificant (Table 1 ). Based on the above results, researchers concluded that the most effective method for PSD management was to use PSD-resistant soybean lines.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Yield performance and percentage Phomopsis seed infection of Phomopsis-resistant soybean lines SS93-6012 and SS93-6181 compared with check cultivars Mustang and Maverick, and Phomopsis spp. seed infection averaged over three locations at each of two planting dates in 2000. {dagger}

 
Characteristics

SS93-6012 is early group IV maturity (relative maturity of 4.2) with purple flowers, gray pubescence, an indeterminate growth habit, tan pods at maturity, yellow color seeds, buff hila and seed weight of ~140 mg seed–1. SS93-6181 is also early group IV maturity (relative maturity of 4.0) with purple flowers, tawny pubescence, an indeterminate growth habit, tan pods at maturity, yellow color seeds, imperfect black hila and seed weight of ~160 mg seed–1. Both SS93-6012 and SS93-6181 are susceptible to soybean cyst nematode (caused by Heterodera glycines Ichinohe) and Phytophthora root rot (caused by Phytophthora sojae M.J. Kaufmann & J.W. Gerdemann). SS93-6012 is highly resistant and SS93-6181 is susceptible to frogeye leaf spot (caused by Cercospora sojina K. Hara).

Availability of Seeds

Seeds of SS93-6012 (PI652442) and SS93-6181 (PI652443) have been deposited in the USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection Center and may be requested from the corresponding author for research purposes, including development and commercialization of new cultivars. We ask that the appropriate recognition be made if this germplasm contributes to the development of a new breeding line or cultivar.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the University of Missouri Agriculture Experiment Station and by the soybean farmer checkoff through the United Soybean Board and the Missouri Soybean Merchandising Council.

Footnotes

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher.

Received for publication January 4, 2008.

References





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pathan, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sleper, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pathan, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sleper, D. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pathan, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sleper, D. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome