Journal of Plant Registrations
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in JOURNAL OF PLANT REGISTRATIONS 1:156-157 (2007)
DOI: 10.3198/jpr2006.03.0198crg
© 2007 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fasoula, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fasoula, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, E. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fasoula, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, E. D.

GERMPLASMS

Registration of Five Soybean Germplasm Lines Selected within the Cultivar ‘Benning’ Differing in Seed and Agronomic Traits

Vasilia A. Fasoulaa, H. Roger Boermaa,*, Jennifer L. Yatesa, David R. Walkerc, Steven L. Finnertyb, Gina B. Rowana and E. Dale Wooda

a Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences
b Dep. of Plant Pathology, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
c USDA-ARS Soybean/Maize Germplasm, Urbana, IL 61801. Contribution from the Georgia Agric. Exp. Stn

* Corresponding author (rboerma{at}uga.edu).

Five soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] germplasm lines were developed by the Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations and released in 2005: G95-Ben335 (Reg. No. GP-332, PI 644042), G95-Ben1818 (Reg. No. GP-333, PI 644043), G95-Ben2403 (Reg. No. GP-334, PI 644044), G95-Ben2448 (Reg. No. GP-335, PI 644045), and G95-Ben4123 (Reg. No. GP-336, PI 644046). They were selected within the productive soybean cultivar ‘Benning’ (Boerma et al., 1997) with differences in seed protein, seed oil, seed weight, or maturity. These lines have use as parents to develop elite breeding populations or use in the study of genetic and physiological mechanisms responsible for conditioning the phenotypes of the selected variants within Benning.

The five Benning-derived germplasm lines were developed by growing single plants in 1995 from 1994 Benning Foundation seed in a replicated-3 honeycomb design (Fasoulas and Fasoula, 1995). The honeycomb trial was planted in three-seeded hills with a spacing of 0.90 m between hills to eliminate plant competition and maximize the yield potential per plant (Fasoula and Fasoula, 1997, 2000; Fasoula and Tollenaar, 2005). Each hill was thinned to one plant per hill and the trial had the plant density of 1.4 plants m–2. Plants were grown to maturity, harvested by hand, and threshed on site (Fasoula and Boerma, 2005). Seed from each single plant was tested for chemical composition and divergent selection of plants for high or low protein and oil content was performed (Fasoula and Boerma, 2005). In 1996, 40 lines derived from single plants contrasting most for protein or oil content plus four entries of Benning were planted in a three-replicate randomized complete block design near Athens, GA. Plots were in one row 3.5 m long with 0.76 m between rows. Data recorded for each plot were maturity, seed weight, seed protein content, and seed oil content.

In 1997, the 32 most divergent lines for the various traits and four Benning entries were grown in a three-replicate randomized complete block design near Athens and Plains, GA (Fasoula and Boerma, 2005, 2007). Plots were in two rows 4 m long with 0.76 m between rows. Data were collected for seed yield, seed weight, seed protein and oil, maturity, and plant height. In 1998, the most divergent Benning-derived lines for each trait were planted in a similar experiment near Athens and Plains, GA (Fasoula and Boerma, 2005, 2007). The experimental unit was the same as in 1997. Data were combined across years and the five lines that were most divergent from Benning either in seed protein, seed oil, seed weight, or maturity were selected for release. To provide a conservative test of significance (low probability of a Type I error) for the comparison of the Benning-derived lines with Benning, the line x environment interaction mean square was used as the error variance, and an LSD was calculated at the {alpha} = 0.001 probability level (Table 1 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Mean seed composition and agronomic performance of five intra-cultivar selections from Benning evaluated across years (Fasoula and Boerma 2005, 2007).

 
The G95-Ben4123 averaged 9 g kg–1 higher seed protein (419 g kg–1) and 8 g kg–1 lower seed oil (199 g kg–1) than Benning when tested in five environments across 3 yr (Table 1). Its seed weighed 146 mg seed–1 and averaged 10 mg seed–1 less than Benning, while it was similar in maturity, and seed yield. G95-Ben2403 averaged 7 g kg–1 higher seed protein (417 g kg–1) and 7 g kg–1 lower seed oil (200 g kg–1) than Benning. It was similar to Benning in seed weight, maturity, and seed yield. G95-Ben1818 produced 137 mg seed–1 seed weight, which was 19 mg seed–1 less than Benning. It was similar to Benning in seed yield, maturity, and seed protein and oil content. G95-Ben335 averaged 17 mg seed–1 greater seed weight (173 mg seed–1) and 6 g kg–1 more seed oil (213 g kg–1) than Benning. Protein content, maturity, and seed yield were similar to those of Benning. G95-Ben2448 matured 4 d earlier than Benning, while seed protein and oil content, seed weight, and seed yield were similar to those of Benning.

G95-Ben4123, G95-Ben1818, G95-Ben335, G95-Ben2403, and G95-Ben2448, like Benning, have determinate growth habit, purple flowers, tawny pubescence, and tan pod walls with shiny yellow seeds and brown hila of varying intensity. Disease and nematode resistance of each line is similar to Benning.

G95-Ben4123, G95-Ben1818, G95-Ben335, G95-Ben2403, and G95-Ben2448 will be maintained by the Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences at the Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602. Small quantities of seeds for research and breeding can be obtained from the corresponding author. Seeds of these lines have been deposited in the National Plant Germplasm System (NPGS) for research purposes, including development and commercialization of new cultivars. Appropriate recognition of the source should be noted if G95-Ben4123, G95-Ben1818, G95-Ben335, G95-Ben2403, or G95-Ben2448 contribute to the development of new genetic stocks, molecular tools, germplasm, or cultivars.

Footnotes

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher.

Received for publication March 26, 2006.

References





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fasoula, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fasoula, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, E. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fasoula, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, E. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome